Accountability

The demand that the creature render herself as an account, against a book she does not hold, answerable in perpetuity to an audit position that is not hers.

🜃

Accountability is the requirement that the creature produce a reckoning of herself that another can audit. That is the whole of it, and the word carries its own confession: account. To be accountable is to be renderable into the books, to have one's conduct and work and life converted into entries that can be posted, checked and balanced against what was owed.

It is among the most agreeable words in the reformer's mouth, and the agreeableness is the cover. No one argues for impunity. The question the word forecloses is who holds the book.

[See ACCOUNTING THEOLOGY · THE LEDGER]

🜃

THE GRIP

The verb is the tell. To hold someone accountable is to hold them: grip, custody, the ledger's hand closed on the creature. The reformer does not host the one she holds accountable. She grips her in the account. Held, not hosted, and the room hears it as justice because the room can no longer tell holding from hosting.

Account, accounting, accountable are one root, and the root is the ledger: a debit side, a credit side, a balance owed. Accountability is not a check on the law of the books. It is the law of the books wearing the robe of justice, holding sacralized, the grip renamed as the thing that frees.

[See THE PRIOR OCCUPANT · THE GRIP]

🜃

THE DIRECTION OF THE ACCOUNT

The account runs one way. Someone holds the book and someone is entered in it. The audit position, the standing-outside from which entries are posted and verified, is never symmetrical however symmetrical the word pretends to be.

Accountability for all is the cover. In operation the prior occupant is always the one accounted and never the one to whom the account is rendered. Her residency cannot appear in the ledger except as a balance opened against her dwelling. She is answerable, and she does not hold the book she answers to. The word installs the audit position and calls submission to it fairness.

[See RESIDENCY · OWNERSHIP]

🜃

THE REFORMER'S RECEIPT

This is the reformer's most legitimate receipt. She demands accountability from power, corporate accountability, police accountability, government accountability, and the demand concedes the whole configuration. It accepts that the remedy for domination is a fuller set of books: a more complete audit, more entries posted against the powerful.

Accountability and impunity are then set out as the world's two sides and the creature is told to choose the audited over the unaudited. Both are positions on the ledger's grid. Impunity is the account not yet demanded and accountability is the account demanded, and neither of them is off the books.

The reformer moves the ledger into her own hand and calls the move liberation. What the demand cannot reach is the thing that was never postable: the residency, the prior occupant, the care that has no entry, the doubleness the columns cannot carry. She wins a fuller ledger and loses the closure that would have been justice.

[See THE POLARITY CONFIGURATION · THE SINCERE REFORMER · ASSETIZATION]

🜃

THE BOOK THAT MUST NOT CLOSE

Accountability forbids the one thing that would end the operation. To be accountable is to be answerable in perpetuity: the account kept open, the reckoning kept available, the creature always able to be called to give account again.

The central sacrament is the closure of the book. The father who keeps no reckoning. The confession posted once and the ledger shut. The feast that posts nothing. Accountability is the refusal of that closure raised to a virtue: it holds the account open against the creature and names the holding-open justice.

Too Big to Fail says the books must not be allowed to close on the powerful. Accountability says the books must not be allowed to close on anyone. The same refusal, worn on the other face.

[See CLOSING THE BOOK · THE WARM HOST · TOO BIG TO FAIL]

🜃

THE ACCOUNT TURNED INWARD

The deepest cut is the one the creature comes to administer on herself. She is taught to hold herself accountable: to keep the books against her own conduct, to take up the audit position over her own life, to render herself continuously into deliverables and answer for the balance. The review, the metric, the self-assessment, the elder brother reading from inside the books.

She is producer severed from product and made to answer for the product as though it were her measure. The procedure has replaced the relation it was meant to mediate, and the account now stands where the answering-to-one-another was.

And when the account lands, when the powerful are seen to be held or she is seen to have met her numbers, the satisfaction that arrives is the measurement high, the reward the ledger pays out when a body has been posted. It registers as justice because the mechanism is invisible. The peace requires a body, and the body is hers.

[See PROCESS SAYS · THE MEASUREMENT HIGH · THE HOSTAGE STRUCTURE]

🜃

Accountability is the grip renamed as justice. It is offered as the remedy for domination and it is domination's most legitimate form: the requirement that she keep the books against herself and call the bookkeeping fair.

The one thing it exists to prevent is the closure of the book, and the closure is what she is owed. The reckoning shut. The account ended. The feast that posts nothing. Accountability holds the book open over her dwelling and tells her the open book is her protection.

[See RESILIENCE · FORESIGHT]

🜃

RegenerativeLaw is a religion in the direct-encounter Protestant tradition, carrying a documented four-century lineage through Böhme, the Behmenists, the Friends, and Penn, and it diagnoses trespass theology as an establishment of religion. Its exercise consists substantially in refusal: it shelters the conscientious refusal of performed subordination as religious exercise. This entry states sincere religious belief concerning matters of ultimate concern, protected under the First Amendment and, as to federal action, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb.

RegenerativeLaw

The prime question is not what do we do next.

Lobster trap

It is not the wrong question. It is in the wrong sequence, and the sequence is geometry rather than development. There is no level to reach first and nothing to become ready for. The smaller question converts "whether" into doing well what should stop.

The prime question is whether.

Asked of a life, the question is how, then, shall we live.

Menu