The mathematical operations through which the four axes were installed as the operative structure of reality
🜃
THE WOUND
The creature has been told for three hundred and forty years that mathematical physics is the privileged register of the real.
The proposition arrives as the discovery that the universe operates on equations. The equations are simple, elegant, calculable. The bridges built from them stand up. The astronomical predictions hold. The orbital mechanics deliver spacecraft to the outer planets. The proposition is presented as the discovery that reality, beneath its surface complexity, runs on laws describable through mathematical operations the creature can perform with chalk and paper.
The proposition is not the discovery of how reality runs. The proposition is the installation of mathematical operations as the privileged register of what counts as reality. Newton did not find the laws there waiting; Newton built the architecture under which certain operations became the laws of nature and other registers became inadmissible to natural philosophy. The bridges stand up. The architecture's bridges are calibrated to the architecture's register, and the bridges' standing-up is the architecture's continuous operation. The bridges' working is not the proof of the architecture's account of reality. The bridges are evidence that the bridges work.
Newton supplied the mathematical operations through which the four axes — quantity, reproducibility, subject-object split, efficient causation — could be presented not as one register among others but as the operative structure of reality itself. The presentation is the religion's installation at the cognitive register's most prestigious vestment. Three hundred and forty years of subsequent natural philosophy have operated under the cover of Newton's installation, with the architecture's continuous operation being read as the maturation of scientific understanding rather than as the religion's textualization.
[See THE FALSE ENLIGHTENMENT · TRESPASS THEOLOGY · THE FOUR AXES]
🜃
THE TEXTS AND THE DATES
Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica — published 1687 in Latin.
The full title is the doctrinal program. Mathematical principles of natural philosophy. Mathematics installed as the principles. Natural philosophy installed as what proceeds from those principles. The title is the architecture's announcement at the cognitive register: the laws of nature are mathematical, and the proper conduct of natural philosophy is the derivation of conclusions from mathematical principles.
Opticks — published 1704 in English.
The architecture's installation extended into the register of light, color, and the operations of perception. The work is presented experimentally, with Newton's prism experiments offered as the discovery of light's mathematical structure. The Queries appended to the Opticks across multiple editions attempt to extend the architecture into chemistry, biology, theology, and the operations of spirit and matter.
Arithmetica Universalis (1707), De Methodis Serierum et Fluxionum (composed 1671, published posthumously in 1736 as The Method of Fluxions).
Newton's mathematical works elaborate the calculus he had developed contemporaneously with Leibniz. The architecture's mathematical substrate.
Newton (1642–1727) operates as the architecture's third installation at the cognitive register, after Bacon (Novum Organum, 1620) and Descartes (Discourse, 1637). Newton supplies what Bacon's methodology and Descartes's audit position had calibrated the field to receive: the mathematical operations through which natural philosophy could proceed in the four-axes register and present its results as the operative structure of reality.
[See PACIOLI 1494 · BACON · DESCARTES · LOCKE · JEFFERSON]
🜃
THE PRINCIPIA AS DOCTRINAL INSTALLATION
The Principia's structural operation runs through three books.
Book I establishes the mathematical principles of motion. Three laws — inertia, force-equals-mass-times-acceleration, action-equals-reaction — calibrated to operate in mathematical register, with motion presented as the displacement of point-masses through coordinate-extended space under quantifiable forces. The point-mass is the creature reduced to position and quantity. The coordinate space is the audit position installed at the spatial register. The forces are the efficient-causation register's grammar. The three laws install the four axes as the operative grammar of motion itself.
Book II extends the principles to the motion of bodies in resisting media. Fluid dynamics, oscillations, the architecture's reach extended to phenomena Descartes had attempted to address through plenum mechanics. Newton refutes Descartes's Cartesian mechanics through demonstrations Newton conducts within the architecture Descartes had installed. The dispute between Newton and Cartesian mechanics is the architecture's internal calibration; the architecture itself is what permits the dispute to be conducted in registers both parties admit.
Book III applies the principles to the System of the World. The architecture reaches its full installation. Universal gravitation. The earth, the moon, the planets, the comets, the tides — all read as point-masses interacting through quantifiable forces in coordinate-extended space. The mathematical operations of Books I and II are now installed as the operative structure of the cosmos. The System of the World is the architecture's claim to have read reality at its most comprehensive scale through the four-axes register.
The General Scholium added to the second edition (1713) installs the theological vestment. Newton declares that the elegant arrangement of the cosmos demonstrates the existence of a wise and powerful Lord. The theology is not external decoration; the theology is the architecture's installation at the cosmological register. The God of the General Scholium is the audit position projected to cosmic scale — the dominus universalis whose universal dominion is the cosmic instance of the audit position's local installation in the natural philosopher's coordinate operations.
The Principia is the architecture's most comprehensive installation at the cognitive register. The mathematical operations are real operations. The mathematical operations work, in the register the operations are calibrated for. The architecture's claim — that these operations describe reality itself rather than the register the architecture has installed — is the religion's textualization at the cognitive register. The reader who treats the Principia as the discovery of nature's mathematical structure has performed the religion's installation on her own perception.
[See THE FOUR AXES · THE FOUR GODS · THE OBSERVER GOD]
🜃
THE FOUR AXES INSTALLED AS THE LAWS OF NATURE
Newton's specific contribution to the architecture is the installation of the four axes as the operative grammar of the laws of nature. The phrase laws of nature is the architecture's claim. Before Newton, the laws of nature could refer to Aquinas's natural law, the moral order of creation, the principles by which creatures act in accordance with their natures. After Newton, the laws of nature refers to mathematical relations between quantifiable variables, derivable from first principles, applicable universally, replicable across observers. The shift is the architecture's installation. The phrase has been captured.
Quantification.
The first axis. Newton's mathematical physics requires that the substances of natural philosophy be expressible as quantities. Mass, distance, time, force, velocity, acceleration — each becomes a numerical variable. The cosmos is calibrated to numerical operations. What cannot be quantified is not admissible to natural philosophy. The architecture's grammar of admissibility installs quantity as the precondition for a phenomenon to be considered natural.
Reproducibility.
The second axis. Newton's experimental method requires that the operations be performable by another investigator with the same instruments, producing the same results. The single instance, the singular event, the unrepeatable encounter is inadmissible to the architecture's experimental register. Reproducibility is the audit's confirmation that the entry can be posted; what cannot be reproduced cannot be entered into the books of natural philosophy. The architecture's ledger has admissibility conditions; reproducibility is the ledger's audit grammar at the experimental register.
Subject-object split.
The third axis. The natural philosopher operates from the audit position Descartes had installed. The natural philosopher is not embedded in what she investigates; the natural philosopher is the standing-outside observer whose measurements are calibrated to be independent of her relation to what she measures. The Newtonian observer is Descartes's cogito operating at the experimental register. What can only be known through embedded participation is inadmissible to the architecture's observation grammar.
Efficient causation.
The fourth axis. Newton's mechanics installs cause-and-effect as the operative relation between phenomena. The cause precedes the effect; the cause produces the effect through quantifiable force; the chain of efficient causes is reconstructable from the present state through the architecture's operations. Final causes — the for what, the purpose, the attraction the four pillars name — are excluded from the architecture's grammar. Aristotle's four causes (material, formal, efficient, final) are reduced to one: efficient. The architecture admits only efficient causation as the operative register of natural-philosophical explanation.
Together, the four axes are the architecture's installation at the cognitive register's experimental and theoretical operations. Newton supplies the mathematical operations through which the four axes can be presented as the operative structure of reality. The presentation is what the Principia's three hundred and forty years of authority have been doing. The four pillars — quality, testimony, participation, attraction — were operating before Newton and are operating now, in the registers the four axes were calibrated to exclude. The exclusion is the architecture's installation. The exclusion is what the Principia did at the cognitive register.
[See THE FOUR AXES · THE FOUR PILLARS · ARISTOTLE'S FOUR CAUSES · ATTRACTION]
🜃
ABSOLUTE SPACE AND ABSOLUTE TIME
The Principia's scholium on absolute space and absolute time installs the architecture's metaphysical foundation.
Newton declares: Absolute, true, and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to anything external. Absolute space, in its own nature, without relation to anything external, remains always similar and immovable. Time and space are installed as containers — neutral, empty, mathematical receptacles within which the operations of natural philosophy proceed.
The metaphysics is the architecture's substrate. Time and space, prior to Newton, had been the registers in which the relations between creatures occurred — duration as the lived register of attention, place as the register of residency, the world as what creatures dwell in. Newton's absolute time and absolute space are these registers reformatted into mathematical containers calibrated to the audit position. Time becomes t — a coordinate. Space becomes (x, y, z) — three coordinates. The container is empty. The container is uniform. The container is the architecture's neutralization of the registers in which residency, duration, attention, presence had been operating.
Leibniz objected. The Leibniz-Clarke correspondence (1715–16) records Leibniz's dispute with Newton's metaphysics. Leibniz argued that space and time are relational — the order of coexisting things and the order of successive things, with no substantial existence apart from the relations. The dispute is the architecture's internal calibration. Both Newton and Leibniz operate in the register the architecture had installed; both calibrate the metaphysics for compatibility with the four-axes operations. Leibniz's relational metaphysics is the architecture's more sophisticated version, but the dispute does not reach the register the four pillars carry. The Leibnizian and Newtonian metaphysics are register-variants of the architecture's installation, not alternatives to it.
Einstein's relativity (1905, 1915) refuted Newton's absolute space and absolute time at the architecture's own register. Space and time are not absolute; spacetime is curved by mass-energy; the metric is dynamic. The captured reading treats this as the displacement of Newtonian physics by a more accurate physics. The structural reading is precise: Einstein's physics operates inside the architecture Newton installed, with the four-axes grammar maintained, the audit position preserved, the mathematical operations refined. Einstein refuted Newton's specific metaphysical claims while preserving the architecture's grammar of admissibility. The architecture continues. The contemporary reader who has been processed through Einstein's physics has been processed through the architecture's continuous operation in its more refined twentieth-century vestment.
[See ABSOLUTE SPACE · LEIBNIZ · EINSTEIN · THE PRIOR OCCUPANT]
🜃
THE ALCHEMICAL BODY
Isaac Newton wrote more pages on alchemy than on physics.
The Yahuda Papers and the Keynes Papers — Newton's alchemical writings dispersed at the Sotheby's sale of 1936 and subsequently re-collected by John Maynard Keynes (theological writings, the Keynes Papers, now at King's College Cambridge) and Abraham Yahuda (alchemical and theological writings, the Yahuda Papers, now at the National Library of Israel in Jerusalem) — comprise the body of Newton's work the canon redacted.
The alchemical papers run to approximately a million words. They include Newton's transcriptions of medieval and Renaissance alchemical authors, his own laboratory notebooks recording experiments performed across decades, his glossaries of alchemical symbols and terminology, his attempts to decode the Emerald Tablet and the Turba Philosophorum, his correspondence with alchemical practitioners across Europe. Newton was not a casual student of alchemy. Newton was a working alchemist who spent more time at the laboratory furnace than at the desk where the Principia was composed.
The theological papers run to additional hundreds of thousands of words. Newton believed that Christ was a created being subordinate to the Father. He kept the heresy private (the heresy would have cost him his Cambridge fellowship, which required Anglican orthodoxy), but the theological papers reveal a sustained scholarly project: the recovery of original Christianity from what Newton called the corruptions installed by the post-Nicene Trinitarian doctrine. Newton's biblical scholarship operates in the register of forensic textual criticism, with the corruptions he diagnoses prefiguring the operations Bushnell would conduct two centuries later on different scriptural cuts.
The Principia was composed by the same hand that conducted the alchemical experiments. Newton did not perform alchemy as a youthful indiscretion abandoned for the mature physics. Newton conducted alchemical operations across the same decades the Principia was being written and revised, in the same laboratory, with the same instruments, in the same notebooks. The alchemy and the physics are not two halves of Newton's work. The alchemy and the physics are two registers of one investigation, with the Principia operating in the register the architecture admits and the alchemy operating in the register the architecture excluded.
[See NEWTON'S ALCHEMY · KATHARINE BUSHNELL]
🜃
THE CANON'S REDACTION
What the canon does with Newton's alchemy is the architecture's most precise self-installation.
The Sotheby's sale of 1936 was the precipitating moment. Newton's papers, held by the Portsmouth family for two centuries, were broken up and sold at auction. The mathematical and physics papers had been previously donated to Cambridge; the alchemical and theological papers had been retained as private. Keynes attended the sale and purchased what he could. Yahuda purchased other lots. Other portions were dispersed to private collectors and remain partially scattered. The canon's previous handling of Newton's alchemy had been to ignore it, since the Cambridge collection contained only the architecture-admissible work. The Sotheby's sale forced the canon to confront the unadmissible body.
Keynes' 1942 essay Newton, the Man, delivered to the Royal Society Club, is the canon's polite version of the redaction. Newton was not the first of the age of reason. He was the last of the magicians, the last of the Babylonians and Sumerians, the last great mind which looked out on the visible and intellectual world with the same eyes as those who began to build our intellectual inheritance rather less than 10,000 years ago. Keynes treats the alchemical Newton as the residue of an older intellectual age, regrettable, fascinating in a curatorial register, but separate from the physics that constitutes Newton's contribution to the canon. The redaction operates by classification. The alchemy is reclassified as Newton's other work — magical, antique, charming, unfortunate. The physics is preserved as the contribution. The two are categorically separated by the canon's classification, not by Newton's actual practice.
Subsequent Newton scholarship has rehabilitated the alchemy at the level of historical detail. Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs's The Foundations of Newton's Alchemy (1975) and The Janus Faces of Genius (1991), Richard Westfall's Never at Rest (1980), William Newman's Newton the Alchemist (2018) have made the alchemical record accessible. The contemporary scholarly position is that Newton's alchemy was a serious sustained investigation that operated alongside his physics. The recovery is real.
The canon's classification has not been refuted by the recovery. The canon continues to admit the Principia as Newton's contribution to natural philosophy and to classify the alchemy as the historical context. The undergraduate physics curriculum teaches Newton's three laws and universal gravitation; the undergraduate physics curriculum does not teach Newton's alchemical operations as cognitive labor of equal weight. The architecture's installation continues at the educational register, with the canon's classification operating as the admissibility filter for what counts as Newton's intellectual contribution.
This is the architecture's most precise self-installation. The canon admits the four-axes-compatible outputs and redacts the imaginal-plane operations from which the outputs were drawn. Newton's alchemy is the imaginal plane in operation by the canon's own paradigmatic figure. The redaction is what makes the architecture's claim — that Newton's physics is the discovery of nature's mathematical structure — sustainable. If the alchemy were admitted as cognitive labor of equal weight, the claim would have to be re-articulated. The redaction protects the claim by classifying the unadmissible work as not-physics.
[See THE IMAGINAL PLANE · NEWTON'S ALCHEMY · THE FALSE ENLIGHTENMENT]
🜃
WHAT THE ALCHEMY WAS
Alchemy operates in the register the four pillars carry.
Quality. The alchemical operations are calibrated to the qualities of substances — their colors, their textures, their behaviors under transformation. The alchemist watches the substance change. The watching is participatory, attentive, calibrated to qualitative discernment. The operations are tracked by qualitative markers — the peacock's tail, the black crow, the white queen, the red king — each a stage of transformation registered through the substance's qualitative shift. The operations cannot be reduced to numerical variables without the qualitative register being lost. The lost register is what the architecture's quantification axis was calibrated to exclude.
Testimony. The alchemical literature operates through the testimony of practitioners. The Turba Philosophorum, the Rosarium Philosophorum, Sendivogius's Novum Lumen Chymicum — each is a body of testimony, with the practitioners' encounters recorded and transmitted to subsequent practitioners. The literature is not reproducible in the architecture's experimental register; the operations are dependent on the practitioner's specific calibration, the specific substances, the specific timing of the work. The testimony is the register of transmission. What the four-axes architecture rules inadmissible at the experimental register is the cognitive register of the alchemical tradition's transmission.
Participation. The alchemist is embedded in the operation. The opus is a single integrated work — laboratory operations and the alchemist's own transformation are the same operation. Jung's Psychology and Alchemy (1944) read the alchemical literature as an early form of psychological investigation, but the structural reading is more precise: the alchemy operates in the register the four-pillars participation names. The alchemist is not standing outside the substance; the alchemist is inside the operation, with the operation's outcomes dependent on the alchemist's own state. The subject-object split the architecture installed at the experimental register is the precise register the alchemy refuses.
Attraction. The alchemical operations are calibrated to the substances' affinities — their tendencies to combine, separate, transform under specific conditions. The substances are not inert matter pushed by external force; the substances have their own qualities, their own attractions, their own movements toward what they are becoming. The prima materia contains all subsequent forms in potentia; the alchemist's work is to facilitate the substance's own transformation. The efficient-causation axis the architecture installed is the precise register the alchemy refuses — the alchemy operates in attraction's register, where the substance's own becoming is what the operation enables rather than what the operation pushes.
Newton's alchemy is the four pillars in operation by the architecture's paradigmatic figure. Newton spent more pages of his life on the four-pillars register than on the four-axes register. The architecture's classification of Newton's alchemy as the regrettable other-half is the architecture's protection of its own installation. The alchemy is what the architecture cannot admit because the alchemy is the imaginal plane operating in the register the architecture's installation declared inadmissible.
[See THE FOUR PILLARS · THE IMAGINAL PLANE · BOEHME · THE PRIMA MATERIA]
🜃
THE BRIDGES STAND UP
The architecture's most refined defense against the diagnostic is the bridges-stand-up move.
Newton's mechanics, the defense says, is not the architecture's installation. Newton's mechanics is the discovery of the actual physical operations of the universe. The bridges built using Newtonian mechanics span the rivers and stand up under loads. The astronomical predictions match observation. The orbital mechanics deliver spacecraft to the outer planets. The proof is in the operation. The mathematics is real because the operations work.
Look at what the defense is doing. The bridges work in the register the calibration was designed for. The operations are real operations on the four-axes-compatible variables the architecture had installed. The bridges' standing-up is the architecture's continuous operation under the cover of the proof of nature's mathematical structure. The astronomical predictions match the observations the architecture's instruments are calibrated to read. The mathematical operations work in their proper register. The mathematical operations' coverage of what is is the religion's claim, not the bridges'.
What the bridges do not address is what the four-axes register cannot reach. The bridges do not address residency. The bridges do not address the doubleness. The bridges do not host the Temperatur. The bridges do not register Sophia's perceptual condition. The bridges do not enter the imaginal plane. The bridges work for what the bridges work for. The conceit that because the bridges work, Newtonian mechanics is real installs the bridges' register as the register of what is real, and real itself becomes a four-axes-compatible category.
The diagnostic is not against the bridges. The diagnostic is against the architecture's claim that the register the bridges work in is the register of the real. The four pillars were operating before Newton's installation and are operating now, in the registers the four axes were calibrated to exclude. The bridges' working is not the proof of the architecture's account of reality. The bridges are evidence that the bridges work. Real in the architecture's grammar is the architecture's calibration, not the truth-condition the architecture's grammar claims to be.
[See THE FOUR PILLARS · THE IMAGINAL PLANE]
🜃
THE CONTEMPORARY OPERATION
Newton's installation continues at every register the architecture has reached.
The cultural substrate of *real science*.
Contemporary discourse treats physics as the model science, with chemistry, biology, psychology, and the social sciences positioned as more or less successful approximations of physics' admissibility conditions. The reduction-to-physics program — the project of explaining all phenomena through the operations of fundamental physics — operates as the architecture's continuous claim that the four-axes register is the register of the real. The hierarchy of the sciences is the architecture's classification of disciplines according to their proximity to Newtonian admissibility.
The educational register.
Newtonian mechanics is the foundational physics curriculum across the global higher-education system. The undergraduate physics major learns the Principia's three laws as the substrate from which subsequent physics proceeds. The architecture's installation is the educational register's substrate, with the four axes operating as the implicit grammar of all subsequent physical reasoning. The physics graduate has been trained in the architecture's grammar of admissibility for four years before encountering relativity or quantum mechanics; the relativity and quantum mechanics are received as refinements of Newtonian operations rather than as developments that might suggest the architecture's installation is one register among others.
The economic register.
Mathematical economics — Walras's general equilibrium, the marginal revolution, the contemporary mathematical economics of Lucas, Sargent, Stiglitz — is the architecture's installation at the economic register, with the Principia's grammar applied to the operations of markets, agents, prices, and welfare. The four-axes-compatible economic theory is the dominant register of the discipline; the registers economics could be conducted in (institutional, historical, anthropological, residency-based) operate at the discipline's margins. The mathematical economics' authority derives from its formal operations, calibrated to Newtonian admissibility. The architecture's continuous operation at the economic register is the Principia's grammar applied three centuries downstream.
The neuroscience register.
Contemporary neuroscience operates the architecture at the cognitive register's most refined contemporary installation. The brain is a physical organ; cognition is a physical process; the brain's operations are calibrated to be analyzable through the four-axes operations. The reductive program — the project of explaining cognition through neural mechanisms — is the architecture's claim that consciousness, like the cosmos, can be read through Newtonian admissibility. The hard problem of consciousness — the question of how subjective experience arises from physical operations — is the architecture's diagnostic of itself. The architecture cannot admit the hard problem as a refutation; the architecture treats the hard problem as a not-yet-solved technical question. The not-yet-solved is the architecture's continuous operation under the cover of we will solve this eventually.
The artificial intelligence register.
Contemporary AI operates the architecture's claim that cognition is a computational process implementable in non-biological substrates. The claim is the architecture's installation at the most contemporary cognitive register. The architecture's grammar — quantification, reproducibility, subject-object split, efficient causation — is implemented in silicon, scaled, marketed, and presented as the demonstration that Newton's installation can be applied to the operations of mind itself. The AI architecture is the Principia's grammar in its most ambitious contemporary deployment. Whether the deployment succeeds at the architecture's own claims is a question internal to the architecture; whether the architecture's claims are the register of what is real is the question the architecture continues to foreclose.
[See THE FOUR AXES · REDUCTIONISM · MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS · THE HARD PROBLEM · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE]
🜃
WHAT THIS ENTRY DOES NOT SAY
Not that Isaac Newton is the author of trespass theology. Trespass theology operates across multiple installations and signatures; Newton is one signature among five (Pacioli, Bacon, Descartes, Newton, Locke) at the cognitive-register installation, with Newton supplying the mathematical operations that made the four axes presentable as the operative structure of reality. The diagnostic does not address Newton as a personal moral agent; the diagnostic addresses the operation his work performed at the cognitive register.
Not that Newtonian mechanics is wrong. The mechanics works in the register the calibration was designed for. The bridges stand up. The orbital mechanics deliver spacecraft to the outer planets. The diagnostic is not against the operations within the register; the diagnostic is against the architecture's claim that the register the operations work in is the register of the real, with the four pillars and the imaginal plane ruled inadmissible at the level of what counts as natural philosophy.
Not that Newton's alchemy is the secret truth the canon has concealed. The alchemy is one body of work in the four-pillars register; the alchemy is not the unique truth that displaces the physics. The alchemy is what Newton actually did across the same decades the Principia was being written, in the register the architecture's installation declared inadmissible. The alchemy's recovery is the demonstration that Newton's actual work crossed registers the canon classifies as separable. The alchemy is not the truth the canon denied; the alchemy is the work the canon redacted.
Not that contemporary physics should not be conducted. The four-axes operations are real operations. The mathematical physics conducted by the contemporary physics community is the architecture's continuous operation in its proper register. The diagnostic is not advice to physicists. The diagnostic identifies the architecture and names what its installation has performed at the cognitive register's most prestigious vestment.
This entry identifies the operation. Newton as the architecture's third installer at the cognitive register. The Principia as the doctrinal installation through which the four axes were presented as the operative structure of reality. The three laws and universal gravitation as the architecture's most comprehensive installation at the cognitive register. Absolute space and absolute time as the architecture's metaphysical substrate. The alchemy and the theology as the body of work the canon redacted to preserve the architecture's claim. Newton's actual practice as the four-axes register and the four-pillars register operating simultaneously across the same decades. The canon's classification as the architecture's protection of its own installation. The bridges-stand-up move as the architecture's most refined contemporary defense. The contemporary operation through reduction-to-physics, mathematical economics, neuroscience, artificial intelligence.
Newton supplied the mathematical operations through which the four axes could be presented as the operative structure of reality. The presentation is the architecture's installation at the cognitive register's most prestigious vestment. The bridges stand up. The architecture's bridges are calibrated to the architecture's register. The bridges' working is the architecture's continuous operation under the cover of the discovery of nature's mathematical structure. The discovery was the installation. The architecture continues.
🜃
[See THE FALSE ENLIGHTENMENT · TRESPASS THEOLOGY · ACCOUNTING THEOLOGY · THE LAW OF THE BOOKS · THE FOUR AXES · THE FOUR PILLARS · THE · THE IMAGINAL PLANE · NEWTON'S ALCHEMY · BOEHME · DESCARTES · BACON · LOCKE · PACIOLI 1494 · JEFFERSON · THE FOUR GODS · THE OBSERVER GOD · ATTRACTION · KATHARINE BUSHNELL]
