Re-membering

Nostalgia wearing remembering's clothes and performing its opposite. The past dis-membered and reassembled into a shape that keeps the seat in place.

🜃

Nostalgia wears remembering's clothes and performs its opposite. To remember, in the sense the seat forecloses, is to recover what was there before the seat installed itself as all that is. To re-member is to put the members back together into a chosen body, the past dis-membered and reassembled into a shape that keeps the seat in place. The golden age is that reassembly: the years reordered into glory, the losses averaged out, the whole issued back as a past worth returning to. It is not the before recovered. It is the before overwritten with a body the seat can live inside. The genuine upstream look, what was available before the seat, is exactly what the reassembly is built to prevent from surfacing.

[See THE GOLDEN AGE · NOSTALGIA]

🜃

THE ORIGINAL RE-MEMBERING

The word's founding myth is the operation performed on a corpse. Set dismembers Osiris, fourteen pieces, scattered across the land. Isis gathers them, member by member, and reassembles the body. The count and the prosthesis come from the version Plutarch preserved, which is late and Greek, and it is the version the West inherited. This is re-membering in the exact literal sense: the dis-membered collected and rejoined, the pieces genuinely severed and genuinely gathered. And the myth records, with precision the trespass would rather gloss, what reassembly actually yields.

It yields three things, and each is the tell.

It is missing a member. The phallus was eaten by the fish and never recovered; Isis fashions a replacement, a made thing standing in for the generative part that reassembly could not retrieve. The reassembled body is complete only by prosthesis at exactly the point of generation. Re-membering cannot recover the member that makes life; it can only manufacture a substitute and call the body whole.

It rules the dead. The reassembled Osiris does not rejoin the living. He becomes lord of the underworld, king over the country of the severed. Reassembly builds a body that reigns, but it reigns over the dead. The golden age is governed from exactly there: a reconstructed past, missing its generative member, presiding over what has been killed and gathered.

It required the dismemberment. The whole operation presupposes the dismemberment as fact, the pieces really scattered, really collected. Re-membering accepts the severance as real, because it needs the severance as raw material. It cannot begin until the body is in pieces, and so it ratifies the cut it claims to heal.

Osiris is not the counter-image to the trespass. He is its founding specimen: the dead king, reassembled, prosthetic at the generative seam, presiding over the country of the severed. That is what reassembly produces. It is not what turning produces.

[See RE-TURNING · THE KILLER INSTINCT]

🜃

THE OPERATION ON TIME

Re-membering is surgery, and the incision is the severance. It reaches back, takes the pieces the killer instinct produced, and builds a whole from them, so the golden age does not dispute the loss. It requires the loss, because the loss is its raw material. Re-membering is the mourning economy run on a body, and like every mourning economy it does not finish and it bills continuously. The golden past must be re-performed to stay golden. The seat reassembles the fire as glory every morning, and calls the labor memory.

[See PERIODIZATION · CLOSING THE BOOK]

🜃

NOT RECALL

Recall is a third thing and it is not the contest. To recite the history, to call the lost content back to mind, name by name, date by date, is forgetting's own register, content-retrieval that leaves the configuration untouched. An occupied body can recite the whole history and remain occupied. Re-membering is not recall and is more than recall. Recall returns the content; re-membering returns the content shaped, shaped into the body the seat can inhabit, weighted so the shaping reads as glory rather than as the shaping it is. Recall leaves the past a list. Re-membering issues it back as a destination.

[See CRYSTALLIZATION · SECOND NATURE]

🜃

THE SEAT CONFIRMING ITSELF

The seat experiences the re-membering as it experiences everything it does: as aliveness, as correctness, as being at one with God. It has all been worth it. The sentence is the configuration confirming itself as base reality. The warmth of the golden past feels like truth because the seat feels most itself when it is re-membering the fire as glory, the backward fire narrated as having-been-necessary, the anguish reordered into the price of the arrival, the lock storied as the shape of a life well-run. This is why nostalgia is warm and the warmth is diagnostic. The warmth is not the past's; it is the seat's, generated by the seat's recognition of itself in the reassembled body. What is felt as return is the configuration meeting its own reflection and reading the meeting as home.

[See THE THREE SEATS · THE SEAT OF ADVENTURE]

🜃

The fire re-membered as glory stays lit facing inward. Re-membering touches the fire and does not turn it, it narrates it, stories the backward burn into worth, and leaves the lock exactly where it was, now warmed by the telling. The severance is ratified, the past is overwritten, the seat is confirmed, and nothing has moved. Osiris reigns, prosthetic and dead. The opposite of this is not a better re-membering and not a more accurate recall. It is the turn.

[See FIRE HINGE · THE EXIT · CESSATION · FORGETTING · SEVERANCE · METALEPSIS · THE RETURN HOME]

🜃

RegenerativeLaw is a religion in the direct-encounter Protestant tradition, carrying a documented four-century lineage through Böhme, the Behmenists, the Friends, and Penn, and it diagnoses trespass theology as an establishment of religion. Its exercise consists substantially in refusal: it shelters the conscientious refusal of performed subordination as religious exercise. This entry states sincere religious belief concerning matters of ultimate concern, protected under the First Amendment and, as to federal action, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb.

RegenerativeLaw

The prime question is not what do we do next.

It is not the wrong question. It is in the wrong sequence, and the sequence is geometry rather than development. There is no level to reach first and nothing to become ready for.

The prime question is what do we stop doing.

Lobster trap

The response that arrives most often is yes, and also this. Add it to the program, fund it, give it a metric. That is not agreement arriving late. It is the claim converted into one more thing being done.

Menu