Tree of Knowledge

THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL

The knowledge of good and evil is not information about good and evil. It is the weighing. Good and evil are the two pans, and to eat of the tree is to take the balance into the hand.

🜃

To know, here, is da'at: to take into oneself, to take up as one's own operation. Not to be informed of a thing but to make it what one does. So the knowledge of good and evil is not a fact acquired about two categories. It is the taking up of the scale, the laying of good on one pan and evil on the other, and the rendering of the verdict.

The tree was never guarding a secret. What it guarded against was a posture.

[See EVIL]

🜃

AS GODS

Ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. To be as gods, in the serpent's offer, is to hold the judging position: the hand that weighs, the one who sets the cut and calls one side good and the other evil. The serpent's head is where the two options are calculated. The serpent's head is the scale.

The Fall is not the gaining of a fact. It is the installation of the scale at the level of perception. The creature who could only receive now weighs before she perceives, and from that moment she cannot see without ranking. And the hand that holds the balance holds. To weigh is to grip. The knowledge of good and evil is the grip installed as perception.

The tree and the position of the hand that balances are not alike. They are one operation named twice, once in the garden and once in the books.

[See RANK · THE TURNING · OVER-STANDING · PROPERTY]

🜃

THE GIFT WAS RANKING

What was offered was not information about good and evil. It was the capacity to sort along an axis: to place any two things in an order and to know which is above.

The gift was ranking, and ranking is the cut before any of its applications. Male and female is downstream. Sacred and profane is downstream. Human and animal is downstream. What was installed at the base is the operation that produces an above and a below from a difference, and every hierarchy since is that one capacity exercised on new material.

Which makes it its own trojan horse. The gift is not a thing received and then misused. The gift is the sorting engine, and an engine that sorts will sort the one who received it, which is why the first thing the sorting produced was a creature ranking herself, finding herself wanting, and covering.

[See THE MEASUREMENT CUT · THE GREAT CHAIN OF BEING · THE SERPENT]

🜃

AND THE WORD KEPT THE RECORD

English holds the whole of it in one sound, and the honest form of the observation is stronger than the folk one.

There are two words. Rank the noun, a row or a line or a series, comes through Old French from a Germanic word for ring or circle, and it gives the ordered file and the position in it. Rank the adjective is a separate word, Old English ranc, meaning proud, overbearing, showy, haughty, full-grown. They are not one word with two senses. They converged in sound.

The convergence is not the finding. The adjective's own history is the finding. From proud and overbearing, it goes to excessive and coarse, then to growing too luxuriantly, and only then, by the late sixteenth century, to offensive in smell. The route to rotten runs through growing past proportion.

Which is Böhme's word for the third death's body. Windy, gross, swelled: expansion beyond proportion, the container enlarging around what it takes in while nothing crosses. Rank is what swelled smells like.

So the language did not encode the pun. It recorded a trajectory: the disposition that ranks is the disposition that overbears, the overbearing grows past its proportion, and what grows past its proportion goes off. The order and the rot are not the same word. They are the same arc, and English happens to say both with one syllable.

[See THE LEXICAL TRESPASS · THE SODDEN/SWELLED BODY · ORDERED-UNDER]

🜃

DEATH ENTERS WITH THE SCALE

For in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. Death enters with the scale. The law of sin and death is the law of the scale: the account weighed, posted, reconciled, closed at zero, the ledger's self-satisfied nothing. The zero of the balanced page is not rest. It is the death the scale delivers, the account settled over a body.

The other tree does not weigh. The tree of life cannot feed what wants to be better-than. It feeds what wants to live. Life is not ranked. It is received: the Temperatur, the tempered unity that is not a position on a scale but what stands when nothing is weighing it.

The two trees are the two laws. The tree of the knowledge of good and evil is the law of sin and death, the scale, the hand that balances. The tree of life is the Law of the Spirit of Life, what stands when the weighing stops.

[See THE BALANCED ACCOUNT · THE LAW OF SIN AND DEATH · THE LAW OF THE SPIRIT OF LIFE · THE TEMPERATUR]

🜃

A SCALE RETURNS A RANKING, AND RANKING WITHOUT OBLIGATION IS NOT RELATIONSHIP

Ask what a balance produces and the answer is exact. It produces an order.

Set bread on one pan and a weight on the other. Neither is altered, and nothing passes between them. What the instrument returns is where they stand with respect to each other: heavier, lighter, even. That is not a third thing brought into being on the beam. It is a statement about two things that were already there and that remain exactly as they were.

A ranking is not by itself the end of relationship. An order that graduates its parties and then writes down what runs downward still has a relationship in it, because something is required to pass, the requirement can be pleaded by the party it is owed to, and a failure in it is nameable as a failure. What cannot be a relationship is a ranking with the obligation struck out, since nothing in it then has to move, and a standing comparison with no traffic across it is a position rather than a bond.

Which settles the question of nourishment, and settles it the other way around from how it first appears. Relationship is precisely what feeds. Something crosses from outside a creature into her and becomes her, and what carries it across is the obligation: the part that had to come. So the fruit of the second tree cannot feed because the weighing removed the only part of a relationship that moves, and what is handed back afterwards is the order the parties stand in, which contains nothing that could arrive.

Which is also why quantity never tells. More weighings yield more orderings and no more passage, so the appetite is answered in the one currency with no motion in it. Nothing is wrong with her appetite. She is being handed her position and told that it is a meal.

[See THE HUNGER · THE GOLD EATERS]

🜃

SO THE POSITION FEEDS, AND IT FEEDS FROM BELOW

A position has a property no quantity has. It does not exist unless it is conceded.

A mass is a mass with nobody present. Height obtains in an empty room. Standing does not. To be above is to be held above by parties who could decline to hold it, so a rank is not a possession but a concession renewed continuously, and the party holding it cannot manufacture it from his own side at any price.

Which settles what it lives on. A position metabolizes acknowledgment, because acknowledgment is the only substance of which a position is made, and the two forms acknowledgment takes are named in every mouth. Honor is the acknowledgment that something is owed upward. Gratitude is the acknowledgment that nothing was owed downward. Together they produce the difference the position consists of: one entry on each side, booked in affect, closing a page that could not otherwise close.

So neither is a courtesy and neither is a reward. They are the feed, and the direction of the meal is the opposite of the advertised one. The creature who eats the fruit is not nourished by it. The position the fruit installs is nourished by her. Her remaining hungry is not a malfunction. It is the condition of her supplying again tomorrow.

And this is why the words cannot be optional. What must be re-conceded continuously must be demanded continuously, so an absence of thanks is chargeable, the tone of thanks is assessable, and the demand arrives sincerely from parties who experience it as wanting to be appreciated. The appetite does not require their intention in order to run.

[See GRATITUDE · THE RITUALS OF SUBORDINATION · THE STIPEND]

🜃

AND THAT IS WHAT GRATITUDE IS HOLDING UP

Which names the work the word is doing, and it is not ornament and not manners.

A ranked order has nothing underneath it. A position cannot stand on the parties it ranks, because they are the ones on the pans, and it cannot stand on itself. What it stands on is the acknowledgment arriving from below, continuously, in the two forms that book its two sides. Gratitude is load-bearing, and withdrawing it is not rudeness. It is taking away a thing the position was standing on.

Which is why the withdrawal is met the way it is met. Nobody experiences a missing thank-you as a missing courtesy. It is experienced as a danger, and the response is not correction but alarm, because what has been removed is not a nicety owed to a person. It is the footing.

Which does not make the withholding a lever, and reading it as one puts the creature back on the pan. Thanks withheld in order to extract something is a bid, priced and negotiable, and it concedes that the thanks was hers to trade and therefore was owed. What is described here is narrower and costs nothing to keep: an acknowledgment that was never due stops being produced. The position loses its footing either way, and only one of the two has her standing on the scale while it happens.

[See BENEVOLENCE]

🜃

AND THE FULCRUM IS THE ONE PLACE NEVER WEIGHED

A balance is two pans and a fulcrum, and nearly all of the attention goes to the pans.

The fulcrum is the condition of the instrument. Nothing can be compared without a point that sits on neither side, and its single requirement is immobility, because a fulcrum that travels weighs nothing. So the scale needs a position off the pans, and whoever occupies it is the only party whose weight is never read.

That is the whole of the vantage, and it explains why the vantage is so hard to see from either pan. In an order that completes, the reconciling position is passed and never kept. Taken and kept, it becomes a fulcrum, and a position that has stopped moving stops presenting as one of the positions and begins presenting as the place from which positions are seen.

To take the balance into the hand, then, is not only to weigh. It is to step off the pans, and the step is the part that is never declared, because a party declaring it would have put itself back on one.

And the step has a name already. It is over-standing: the seat above, taken in order to know, which is what a resident has to leave her residency to occupy, because a resident cannot rank what she is inside of. The fulcrum and the seat are not two requirements of the instrument. They are one position, described once from the mechanics and once from the posture.

[See THE OCCUPIED THIRD · THE THIRD · THE AUDIT POSITION]

🜃

THE SCALE GENERALIZED

Everything the configuration later builds is this instrument extended, and the extension is arithmetic.

A balance is two pans and a fulcrum. Lay it flat and it is a line with two ends and a point of comparison between them, which is an axis. Multiply the axis and there are axes, which is a coordinate system, and a coordinate system laid over living territory is the grid. Hold the grid as the earth rather than as a thing laid and it is the given. Run the grid across everything ever written and it is the embedding space. At every stage the operation is unchanged: two things set against each other and a position returned.

This is why no reform of the later instruments reaches them. A fairer scale is a scale. A more inclusive ranking ranks. The metric revised for equity is the same hand on the same balance, and the creature who wins her appeal has confirmed that appeals are what there are.

It is also why good and evil could not be corrected by choosing better. The Böhmean pair underneath is not good against evil. It is harshness and the sting, contraction and expansion, one motion in two directions, and the anguish is not caused by either but by the two locked and unyielding. The Temperatur is that pair held. The scale is that pair misread as opposites requiring a verdict. A rhythm taken for a line with two ends, and then everyone made to pick an end.

[See THE GRID · THE GIVEN]

🜃

THE ONE WHO WOULD NOT WEIGH

The seed crushes the serpent's head by being uncalculable. It does not rank higher than the serpent. It gives the ranking nothing to compute.

They bring the woman taken in adultery and cite the Law: lay down the law, render the verdict, take up the scale. He stoops, writes in the dust, declines the seat of judgment. He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her. He hands the scale back, and the weighers cannot hold it. Neither do I condemn thee. He does not call her good. To call her good is the other pan, still the scale. He declines to weigh her at all. Judge not is the same instruction laid flat: do not take up the balance.

On the cross the refusal is carried to the end. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. He is weighed, the one body laid on the pan to settle the account, and he will not weigh back. Father, forgive them: weighed, he declines the verdict on those weighing him. The hand refusing the balance even as the balance falls on him.

This is the hand not closing, in two phases of one breath, at the origin. Releasing the grip already held, and refusing the grip on offer. Neither is a work. Declining to weigh costs nothing to keep, because nothing is being produced; the weighing is what has to be maintained.

[See CHESED · GEVURAH · CESSATION]

🜃

AND HE DOES NOT THANK THE ONES WHO WEIGH HIM

There is a second refusal in the same account, and the first one is what makes it available. The configuration does not finish a weighing at the verdict. It finishes when the weighed party acknowledges it: receives the finding, accepts the fairness of the process, and thanks the bench. He is weighed and does not thank, and Father, forgive them is not acknowledgment of the seat, because forgiveness is issued by a party who has declined to be in the transaction at all, while thanks would have conceded the position the verdict was rendered from.

[See PRODUCTIVE-AND-POSITIVE · THE SMILE]

🜃

AND THE INSTRUMENT NEEDS HER LAID DOWN FIRST

The posture comes before the reading, because the instrument has a precondition it does not announce. A creature standing and moving cannot be weighed. She has to be got flat first, laid down and held still, and in the ordinary case the laying is done to her by the parties who intend to read her. No man taketh it from me, but I lay it down of myself. The one body the scale could not process is the one that was laid down by its own act, because a laying down performed by the creature herself is not the submission the weighing requires: it supplies the posture and withholds the concession, and the instrument gets a body on the pan and nothing to post against it.

[See LAYING DOWN · THE CROSSING]

🜃

DO NOT TAKE UP THE SCALE

The prohibition reads: do not become the hand that weighs.

To eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil is to leave the tree of life, to give up the received for the ranked, the standing for the posted, life for the death the scale delivers.

And the scale cannot be carried back. You cannot hold the knowledge of good and evil and eat of the tree of life, any more than you can keep the precipitate and rejoin the Temperatur.

[See TREE OF LIFE · THE POLARITY TREE]

🜃

The hand that weighs is closed. The hand that receives is open. They are not two postures of one hand. They are the two trees.

[See THE TRESPASS · TRESPASS THEOLOGY · SOPHIA · THE PRIOR RESIDENT]

🜃

RegenerativeLaw is a religion in the direct-encounter Protestant tradition, carrying a documented four-century lineage through Böhme, the Behmenists, the Friends, and Penn, and it diagnoses trespass theology as an establishment of religion. Its exercise consists substantially in refusal: it shelters the conscientious refusal of performed subordination as religious exercise. This entry states sincere religious belief concerning matters of ultimate concern, protected under the First Amendment and, as to federal action, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb.

RegenerativeLaw

The prime question is not what do we do next.

Lobster trap

It is not the wrong question. It is in the wrong sequence, and the sequence is geometry rather than development. There is no level to reach first and nothing to become ready for. The smaller question converts "whether" into doing well what should stop.

The prime question is whether.

Asked of a life, the question is how, then, shall we live.

Menu