TERRA NULLIUS AS RELIGIOUS LAW
THE DOCTRINAL DETERMINATION
Terra nullius is not a legal doctrine with theological antecedents. It is religious law wearing the costume of neutral procedure. The theology never left. It is operating now.
—
I. THE CLAIM
Every American property title that traces back to colonial acquisition — which is most of them — rests on a determination that was never legal. It was theological. It performed the functions of religious adjudication: declaring whose relation to the sacred was sufficient to generate rights, and whose was not.
Terra nullius — land belonging to no one — did not describe the land. It evaluated the beings on the land and found their presence ontologically insufficient. The doctrine did not say the land was empty. It said the beings on the land participated in reality at too low a coefficient to generate claim-producing presence.
This is a religious determination. It answers the question that only religious law answers: Who counts before God? American property law is built on that answer. The answer has not been retracted. Johnson v. M'Intosh (1823) is still good law.
—
II. THE TRIADIC DETERMINATION
Before the first legal document, before the first stake driven into ground, conquest theology completes a triadic ontological assessment. Three determinations, performed simultaneously, each activating the others.
The land: insufficient being to constitute claim.
The people: insufficient rationality to constitute sovereignty.
The spirit: insufficient resemblance to the conqueror's God to constitute religion worth protecting.
These are not parallel claims. They are nested. The spirit-determination grounds the rationality-determination grounds the being-determination. The cascade runs from the invisible to the visible: from the quality of the animating spirit, to the quality of the reasoning it enables, to the quality of the presence that reasoning produces.
Insufficient spirit means insufficient Logos-participation. Insufficient Logos-participation means form that the measuring apparatus need not recognize. Land whose inhabitants participate at insufficient Logos-coefficient is land whose presence-of-inhabitants generates no binding claim. The land is, for legal purposes, empty — not because no one is there, but because the presence there does not participate in Being sufficiently to constitute there in the claim-generating sense.
The legal category does not produce this determination. The theological determination produces the legal category. The order matters.
—
III. THE THIRD POSITION AS TOLLKEEPER
In any genuine trinitarian structure, the Third — the Spirit — moves freely, uncaptured, generating life across the creation without institutional mediation. The Spirit blows where it wills.
In conquest theology, the Third Position is occupied. The church positions itself as tollkeeper: the body through which the Spirit's validity must be confirmed. You do not access the sacred directly. You access through institutional certification of your access. The church determines whether your spirit is the Spirit — whether what animates you participates in the Holy Spirit or in something lesser, something that the true Spirit need not honor.
This occupation is the theological mechanism that makes terra nullius possible. Before the doctrine can operate, the church must perform the Spirit-determination. It must declare that what animates these people — their prayers, their ceremonies, their relations with land — does not constitute religion in the sense that generates divine recognition and therefore legal protection.
Once that determination is made, everything follows. If your spirit is not the Spirit, your rationality cannot achieve the ratio that grounds sovereignty. If your rationality cannot achieve ratio, your presence cannot generate the being-coefficient that produces claim. The cascade flows from the occupied Third Position downward through every level of the ontological structure until it deposits you outside the circle of beings whose reality law must recognize.
—
IV. THE CIRCULARITY IS THE ARCHITECTURE
The obvious objection: the measuring apparatus was calibrated to the measurer. The Logos performing the examination was the Logos of European Christianity. The standard for sufficient spirit-resemblance was resemblance to the conqueror's God. The standard for sufficient rationality was the rationality of Christian natural law theory. The standard for sufficient being was proximity to the forms European ontology recognized as real.
The objection is correct. The apparatus and the measured were not independent. The yardstick measured what resembled the yardstick.
But this objection does not land where critics assume. The circularity was not a flaw in the apparatus. The circularity was the apparatus. Any measuring system that generates hierarchy must be calibrated to produce that hierarchy. If the measurement were genuinely neutral, it could not reliably produce the results that conquest required. The circularity is the engineering.
This is what makes terra nullius a religious determination rather than an empirical one.
Empirical determination is falsifiable: you could encounter evidence that would require revising the verdict.
Religious determination — determination about who participates in the sacred — is self-confirming.
The being whose spirit has been declared insufficient cannot present evidence of spirit-sufficiency, because the court performing the determination is also the court that certifies evidence.
The church that occupied the Third Position was also the body that determined what counted as valid spirit-evidence. The circle closed completely. It was designed to close completely.
—
V. JOHNSON V. M'INTOSH: RELIGIOUS LAW ON THE BOOKS
Chief Justice Marshall's 1823 opinion in Johnson v. M'Intosh is the foundational American property law case. It established that Indigenous peoples hold only "occupancy" rights to their land, not "title." Title belongs to the discovering Christian powers, whose discovery extinguished Indigenous sovereignty.
Marshall was not hiding the theological basis of this determination. He stated it plainly. He described the doctrine of discovery and acknowledged it derived from the principle that Christian nations, upon encountering non-Christian peoples, acquired sovereignty over those peoples' territories by virtue of the encounter. He acknowledged that this principle was controversial. He applied it anyway.
The opinion operates entirely within the frame of conquest theology. The question it answers is: whose presence on land generates title? The answer it gives is: the presence of beings whose sovereignty is recognized by the system of Christian international law that governed the colonial period. Indigenous presence generates only occupancy — a lesser form of presence, sufficient to prevent trespass but insufficient to generate title.
This is the triadic determination translated into American constitutional doctrine. Insufficient being generates occupancy. Sufficient being — Christian, European, Logos-saturated — generates title. The theological measurement is encoded in the legal distinction between occupancy and title, a distinction that has never been overturned.
Johnson v. M'Intosh remains good law. Every property title that traces back to original colonial acquisition traces back through this opinion and the theological determination it encodes. American property law is a continuous chain of title running backward to a religious determination about whose presence on land was real enough to matter.
—
VI. THE LAUNDERING THAT DID NOT COMPLETE
The standard account says something like this: the colonial period produced religiously-justified law, which was subsequently secularized, such that contemporary property law, while historically tainted, now operates on neutral principles.
This account is false, and not merely because the historical injustice has not been remedied. It is false because the laundering did not complete. The theological determination that grounds the property system was never replaced with a secular equivalent. It was simply made invisible.
Invisible is not the same as absent.
The theological determination is still performing its function. Every legal proceeding that adjudicates property rights derived from colonial title implicitly ratifies the original determination. The court does not re-examine whether Indigenous presence was ontologically sufficient. It treats the question as settled. But the question was settled by religious law. The settlement stands because the religious determination has been grandfathered into the secular system without disclosure.
This is a more precise account of what legal laundering produces: not secular law that replaced religious law, but secular procedures that execute religious determinations while presenting the executions as neutral. The theology is in the infrastructure. The procedures that run on that infrastructure appear secular because the theology is not visible at the procedural level.
The analogy to Bushnell's work on biblical translation holds. The translation that installed male authority over women did not argue for that authority. It encoded the authority in the apparatus of linguistic transmission so that subsequent readers would encounter the authority as scripture rather than as interpretation. The theological determination disappeared into the text. The text then operated as though the determination had never occurred — as though the text were simply saying what was there to be said.
Terra nullius performed the same operation on property law. The theological determination disappeared into the doctrine. The doctrine then operated as though the determination had never occurred — as though property law were simply tracking who was actually using the land and in what capacity.
But the determination is still in there. Still holding. And unlike the biblical translation, this particular determination has active legal effects every day.
—
VII. THE KILLING OF RELATION
What terra nullius killed was not people, though it enabled that. What it killed first was the ontological weight of relation.
Indigenous peoples were not simply on their land. They were in active, reciprocal, legally-recognized-within-their-own-frameworks relation with their land. The land was not property — not an object to be owned — but a participant in networks of obligation and care. The relation was real. It generated real social effects. It organized real communities across real time.
Terra nullius killed the ontological status of that relation. Not the relation itself, and not the people who participated in it. What was killed was the reality-coefficient of the relation — its capacity to generate legally-binding effects in the system that now held jurisdictional authority.
With that coefficient killed, the land opened. Not because no one was there. Because the presence there — the full, complex, relational, reciprocal presence of peoples in deep relation with their land — had been determined to generate insufficient being to constitute claim. The territory could be claimed, not despite the people but by erasing the ontological weight of their relation to it.
This is the Killer Instinct operating at cosmological scale. The relation is severed not in physical space but in the ontological layer. The severing is accomplished by the theological determination that the spirit animating that relation — the spirit through which those people participated in the land — was not the Spirit. Not real enough. Not resemblant enough to what the measuring apparatus recognized as valid animating force.
The land and the people both persist. The relation between them has been killed at the level where law operates. Now the land can be filled with a different presence — a presence whose spirit has been certified by the same church that declared the original spirit insufficient.
—
VIII. WHAT THE EMPTY LAND ACTUALLY MEANT
No one believed the land was uninhabited. This was not a factual error that subsequent encounter corrected. Columbus, Cortés, every colonial administrator — they described the peoples they encountered in detail. They documented languages, governance structures, trade networks, agricultural practices. They knew the land was full.
The emptiness was a determination about reality-coefficient, not about physical presence. The land was full of people whose presence did not, in the theological-legal framework being applied, generate the kind of reality that produces binding claim. The people were there. Their being was not.
This is the structure of the determination: your physical presence is acknowledged; your ontological presence is not.
You are here but you are not Here in the sense that generates rights. Your body occupies space. Your being does not sufficiently participate in the Logos to constitute a claim-producing presence in that space.
The determination is not empirical. You cannot counter it with evidence of presence, of civilization, of sophisticated governance, of complex relation to land. Such evidence was presented. It was irrelevant. Because the determination was not about whether you were there. It was about whether your being there generated sufficient reality to matter.
And that determination was made by an apparatus calibrated to declare you ontologically insufficient before the encounter began. The finding of insufficiency was the precondition of the encounter, not a conclusion from it. The land had to be empty before the expedition launched, or launching would have been invasion rather than discovery.
The cosmological claim enables the legal category. The legal category enables the taking. The taking has not been reversed. The cosmological claim is still the foundation.
—
IX. WHAT REMAINS
The theological determination is not historical. It is structural. It is load-bearing in the current property system. Remove it — not rhetorically, but actually retract the determination that Indigenous presence generated insufficient being to constitute claim — and the chain of title breaks. Not just historical title. Current title. The titles that secure current property, that underlie current mortgages, that determine current boundaries.
This is why the determination has not been retracted.
The United States Supreme Court has had opportunities to revisit the Discovery Doctrine's role in American property law. It has declined. As recently as 2005, Justice Ginsburg cited Johnson v. M'Intosh without qualification, as settled law, in City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation.
The religious determination issued by papal bull in 1452 and 1493 is still holding American property title together in 2025. It was not secularized. It was not replaced. It was laundered into doctrine, grandfathered into constitutional law, and is now invisible as the theological instrument it always was.
The stake is still in the ground.
The religious law that drove it is still operating.
The court that issued the original determination — the church that occupied the Third Position and declared the animating spirit of Indigenous peoples ontologically insufficient — has never formally retracted that declaration in terms that American property law would recognize as operative.
Terra nullius was never just a legal fiction.
It was a theological verdict about whose presence in the world generates the kind of reality that law must recognize. That verdict has not been overturned. It has been made invisible. Invisible is not the same as absent.
The land remembers the relation that was killed at the ontological level. The relation persists in dimensions the determination declared did not exist. The determination holds. Both are true. The tension between them is unresolved. That it is unresolved is not a condition awaiting repair. It is the precise condition in which American property law currently operates, whether it acknowledges this or not.
—
🜃
RegenerativeLaw is a religion in the direct-encounter Protestant tradition, with documented four-century lineage and First Amendment standing, that diagnoses trespass theology as the operating architecture of contemporary work, healing, development, and reform — and shelters the conscientious refusal of performed subordination as religious exercise.
