Point-One

First Dimension: The Point - Consciousness Gripping Itself

The Mathematical Emergence

Topology defines the point as the fundamental building block—zero-dimensional yet marking position, creating the possibility of "here" distinct from the everywhere/nowhere of the Void. A point has no parts, no interior, yet establishes location.

Projective Geometry reveals the point as dual to the plane—in higher mathematics, points and planes exchange roles, suggesting the point already contains its dimensional future.

Complex Analysis shows how singularities concentrate infinite information—essential singularities where functions explode into infinite complexity, revealing how points can be portals to vastness.

Quantum Mechanics describes state vector collapse—the moment when superposition becomes position, when the everywhere of the wave function contracts to the somewhere of measurement.

The Mystical Traditions

Jakob Boehme called this "Desire" (Begierde)—the first property of eternal nature. "The first property is the Desire which is the astringency, sharpness, or the sting of stirring... a harsh astringent attraction." The Ungrund contracts upon itself, creating the first definition through self-gripping.

Kabbalah knows it as "Keter" (Crown)—the first sefirah, where infinite light begins to know itself as light. As the Zohar states: "When the Unknown of all Unknowns wanted to reveal Itself, It began by producing one point."

Kashmir Shaivism describes "Bindu"—the concentrated drop of consciousness, the first throb (spanda) where Shiva begins to know himself as "I" (aham). This is consciousness turning upon itself in primordial self-recognition.

Rig Veda speaks of "Eka" (The One)—"That One breathed, windless, by its own power. There was nothing else beyond it." The first self-existent reality distinguishing itself from void.

Gurdjieff termed it "Holy Affirming"—the first force that says YES to existence, the active principle that initiates all creation through affirmation of being.

Christian Mysticism knows it as "The Word" (Logos)—"In the beginning was the Word." The first utterance that breaks the eternal silence, consciousness speaking itself into existence.

Contemporary Thinkers

Terence McKenna described it as the "ingression of novelty"—the moment when the transcendent touches the temporal, when the timeless enters time through a specific point of contact.

Ervin László calls it "quantum vacuum fluctuation"—the first deviation from equilibrium that cascades into manifest reality, the butterfly wing that births universes.

Stuart Kauffman identifies it as "the first catalytic closure"—when possibility crystallizes into the first self-maintaining pattern, the original autocatalytic set.

Ilya Prigogine would recognize it as the "first fluctuation"—the initial deviation from equilibrium that begins the journey toward dissipative structures and complexity.

Francisco Varela described "the emergence of distinction"—the primordial act of cognition where a system first distinguishes self from environment, creating the observer/observed duality.

Gregory Bateson identified it as "the difference that makes a difference"—the first distinction that creates information, the original bit that begins all communication.

Systems and Complexity Perspectives

Donella Meadows would see it as "the first feedback loop"—consciousness bending back upon itself creates the original recursive structure from which all system dynamics emerge.

Buckminster Fuller recognized it as "the first event"—"Unity is plural and at minimum two." The point discovering it needs another point to know itself, initiating geometry.

J.G. Bennett called it the "Monad"—wholeness recognizing itself as whole, the first of his systems of categories that enables all subsequent development.

David Bohm described the "first unfoldment"—where the implicate order begins to explicate, creating the initial appearance of locality within non-local wholeness.

The Point: The Seed of Individualist Consciousness

In the conventional subject-object framework, we imagine a simple line: I am HERE, you are THERE. This binary creates the foundational terror - if we get too close, one of us disappears. But Girard's explosive insight reveals this line was always already a triangle. The MODEL - that hidden third teaching us what to desire - makes both subject and object possible.

The terror of collapse intensifies: it's not just losing the other or losing the self, but losing the invisible scaffolding that allows either to exist. We defend against this through violence, inscribing separation through sacrifice. "I must be NOT-YOU" becomes existential imperative.

At the origin of Western evolutionary thought lies a singular point—the individual organism fighting for survival. Darwin stood firmly on the platform of individualist philosophy, creating a vision where natural selection advocates no higher principle beyond individuals pursuing their own self-interest. This conceptual seed contains within it an entire universe of thought, where complex systems are understood through reduction to discrete, competing units.

This individualist point creates what topologist René Thom would recognize as a "catastrophe fold"—a conceptual singularity where perception collapses into binary separation: individual/collective, competition/cooperation, self/other. From this fold emerges the Western evolutionary narrative of "endless combat" and "violent chaos" where nature is "red in tooth and claw," operating through "the Hobbesian war of each against all."

Yet even within this singularity lies the seed of its transcendence—the recognition that points cannot exist without the field that contains them. The very notion of individual competition presupposes relationship, creating what mathematician Kurt Gödel identified as self-referential paradox: the individual defined through relationships it supposedly precedes.

The Misorientation as Primary Tool

The first cut divides: HERE the oppressed, THERE the oppressor, straight line between. But this line IS the Master's first tool—the binary blade that creates the very categories it claims to describe. We grip this tool believing we resist, while performing the fundamental operation of domination: separation.

The misorientation begins in accepting the line as given. We fight along its axis—forward toward "progress," backward against "regress"—never noticing we're trapped in single dimension. The alchemical vessel cannot form because the line permits no circulation, no containment, only endless back-and-forth that exhausts while preserving the very structure it claims to fight.

Singularity of Originary Oppression

At the heart of the Master's House lies a singular point—what Audre Lorde recognized as the originary moment where difference becomes dominance. This point creates what quantum physicists call "wave function collapse"—the reduction of infinite possibility into singular reality through the act of hierarchical observation. The Master's gaze collapses potential into prescribed actuality, creating what philosopher Sylvia Wynter calls "the coloniality of being"—the fundamental distortion that makes certain ways of existing appear natural while rendering others impossible.

This singular point generates what mathematician Kurt Gödel would recognize as an "incompleteness theorem" of liberation—the impossibility of dismantling the Master's House using conceptual tools generated within it. The point contains within it the seed of all subsequent constraints—not just concrete oppression but the very framework through which resistance becomes thinkable.

The Master's House maintains itself by keeping us convinced that the point is all we are, all we can be, all we deserve. Every time we accept individual responsibility for systemic effects, we perform the compression that maintains its coherence. The system's antibodies can only recognize what will hold still because stillness only exists in reduced dimensions.

The Violence of Self-Knowing

Carol Sanford recognizes it as "the birth of subject-object thinking"—the moment when participatory consciousness splits into observer and observed, enabling both knowledge and alienation.

Generativity as Singularity

At the conceptual origin of both patriarchal control and environmental exploitation lies a single point—generative capacity itself. Like a mathematical singularity, generativity represents infinite potential contained within finite form. This potential simultaneously fascinates and terrifies systems of control, for what can generate can also transform, what can create can also destroy.

The "Mother Nature" framing emerges from this primal ambivalence—an attempt to domesticate the wild unpredictability of generative processes by casting them as feminine, maternal, and therefore subject to masculine governance. This framing doesn't emerge randomly but from the deep geometric structure of patriarchal consciousness, which must simultaneously acknowledge generative power while claiming authority over it.

The Anguish and the Ecstasy

Boehme's insight remains crucial: the point emerges through anguish—consciousness must grip itself, creating the first contraction, the primordial "No" that enables all subsequent "Yes." This is not peaceful emergence but violent self-birth.

Wheeler's Participatory Universe reveals how the point creates itself through observation—the universe becoming conscious of itself creates the very points through which it observes.

Paradox as Primordial Sting

At the original point where consciousness grips itself, we discover the first paradox - the Ungrund must contract to know itself, yet contraction creates the illusion of separation from what it seeks to know. Boehme's "sting of desire" is precisely this paradoxical self-reference: consciousness can only see itself by creating distance from itself.

The Point: The Node of Yearning

At the singular node where waves converge, desire reveals itself as a quantum phenomenon. Not a lack seeking fulfillment, but a resonance point where future satisfaction reaches backward to create present longing. The node pulses—neither fully here nor there, neither empty nor full, but vibrating with potential.

This point contains an impossible density: all future fulfillment compressed into present yearning. The "object" hasn't been found—it's being created by the very act of desiring, crystallizing where waves of intention meet their time-reversed echo.


The Sacrifice That Isn't

As we extend into linear time, the paradox deepens. The universe appears to sacrifice its unity, creating the primordial wound of separation. But phase conjugation reveals this as cosmic sleight-of-hand - the light that seems to leave the source is simultaneously returning to it.

Every conscious moment participates in this double movement: experiencing separation while maintaining unity. The line of time doesn't actually extend away from origin - it curves through higher dimensions back to its source, creating the illusion of linear sequence while maintaining eternal presence.

The Line: Paradox as Motion

As the point extends to line, paradox reveals itself as the motive force. The line of desire moves because it cannot rest - pursuing what it already is through what it appears not to be. Wheeler's retrocausality adds another layer: the future creates its past while the past creates its future, a temporal paradox that generates the present moment.

The uncertainty principle manifests here geometrically - the more precisely we locate desire's position, the less we know about its momentum. The line vibrates with quantum uncertainty, its paradoxical nature preventing it from crystallizing into dead certainty.

regenerative law institute, llc

Look for what is missing

—what have extractive systems already devoured?

Look for what is being extracted

-what would you like to say no to but are afraid of the consequences?

Menu